Skip to content
2026 Criminal Trialtrial-daytrial-dayShanan BuckinghamJennifer SpragueKevin ReddingtonDonald CondieElizabeth LaposataPaul ZeizelSusan ClancydirectcrossredirectrecrossDay 15 - August 18, 2026Defense witnesses addressed Lindsay Clancy’s reported symptoms, treatment history, and injuries. Susan Clancy and Donald Condie faced questions about the limits of their knowledge, Elizabeth Laposata defended her injury and strangulation opinions, and Paul Zeizel described his interviews and opinion that Clancy was not malingering.
← Day 142026 Criminal TrialDay 16 →

Day 15 - August 18, 2026

Family Testimony, Mental Health Evidence, and Injury Reconstruction

Judge William Sullivan
18Proceedings
5Pages
4Witnesses
1,794Lines
Day 15 of 28
Appearing:

Defense witnesses addressed Lindsay Clancy’s reported symptoms, treatment history, and injuries. Susan Clancy and Donald Condie faced questions about the limits of their knowledge, Elizabeth Laposata defended her injury and strangulation opinions, and Paul Zeizel described his interviews and opinion that Clancy was not malingering.

Full day summary

The defense called Susan Clancy, psychiatrist Donald Condie, forensic pathologist Elizabeth Laposata, and psychologist Paul Zeizel. Their testimony addressed Lindsay Clancy’s reported symptoms, treatment history, injuries, and accounts of hearing a voice. Susan described Lindsay as a loving mother who reported insomnia, appetite loss, anxiety, and sadness in November 2022. She said Lindsay was seeking help, but acknowledged that she had not attended the provider meetings discussed or known what Lindsay told clinicians. After agreeing on redirect that Women and Infants turned Lindsay away because she was overmedicated, Susan qualified her knowledge on recross: she had not reviewed the records and recalled Patrick and Lindsay saying she was not a candidate. The court admitted Susan’s text-message extraction report as Exhibit 279 over objection. Condie’s consultation concerned psychopharmacology. He had never interviewed Lindsay or evaluated her criminal responsibility. Drawing on records, he described possible activation after a Zoloft increase and symptoms he said never completely resolved. Cross-examination addressed treatment Lindsay declined, uncertain medication doses, and the limits of his review. He agreed that she had not reported hearing a voice to three identified providers and that the only reported occasion was January 24, 2023. On redirect, he discussed episodic psychosis and recorded fears about losing her children; concern about her nursing license was expressly speculation. Laposata reconstructed a headfirst fall and described cutting wounds, spinal injuries, blood loss, and hypothermia. Her illustrations were admitted as Exhibit 281 over renewed objections. She acknowledged never examining Lindsay, while defending her reconstruction against questions about absent skull fracture, brain injury, and visible exterior head injury. On strangulation, she gave varying estimates of seconds to unconsciousness and agreed that pressure must continue for several minutes to cause death. She said securely wrapped elastic bands could maintain that pressure without continued manual application. When the prosecutor demonstrated a band arrangement coming apart, Laposata acknowledged the demonstration but did not expressly withdraw her opinion. Zeizel testified that Lindsay was not faking and showed no evidence of malingering. He described disorientation and fuzzy memory during a hospital interview while she was receiving postoperative pain medication. He said he heard her tell Patrick by speakerphone that a male voice ordered her to kill the children and herself, and denied suggesting that account. He also testified that psychotic symptoms can fluctuate and coexist with ordinary activities. The court recessed after his direct examination.

Video thumbnail3:42:56
Watch →

1. Susan Clancy — Direct/Cross/Redirect/Recross

Susan Clancy testifies about Lindsay’s symptoms, treatment efforts and family support. Cross-examination probes the limits of her recollection and firsthand knowledge before she is excused.

→
Direct
Susan Clancy - Direct Examination Susan Clancy Kevin Reddington
152 lines

Susan Clancy described Lindsay's loving parenting, reported distress and requests for treatment. Their text-message report was admitted as Exhibit 279 over objection.

Cross
Susan Clancy - Cross-Examination Susan Clancy Shanan Buckingham
249 lines

Susan Clancy defended the family's childcare arrangements but acknowledged limits on her knowledge of Lindsay's treatment. The judge instructed jurors not to consider a religious question.

Redirect
Susan Clancy - Redirect Examination Susan Clancy Kevin Reddington
14 lines

Susan Clancy agreed that Lindsay was turned away from a treatment program because of overmedication and again after calling suicide hotlines twice.

Recross
Susan Clancy - Recross-Examination Susan Clancy Shanan Buckingham
17 lines

Susan Clancy acknowledged limited knowledge of the program visit. Buckingham questioned postpartum timing and described alternative treatment options.

Redirect
Susan Clancy - Further Redirect Examination Susan Clancy Kevin Reddington
12 lines

Susan Clancy did not know about the unreturned provider call alleged by defense counsel. She was excused, and jurors took a break.

Highlights

3. Donald Condie — Direct/Cross/Redirect/Recross

Defense psychiatrist Donald Condie discussed Clancy’s reported symptoms and treatment, then faced questions about his sources and conclusions. His testimony ended with acknowledgment of speculation about her concerns, followed by a technology-related recess.

→
Procedural
Condie Testimony Allowed Without Standard-of-Care Opinions
37 lines
Direct
Donald Condie - Direct Examination Donald Condie Kevin Reddington
386 lines

Donald Condie discussed recorded postpartum symptoms, medication effects and treatment gaps, while confirming he had not evaluated Lindsay Clancy's criminal responsibility.

Cross
Donald Condie - Cross-Examination Donald Condie Shanan Buckingham
149 lines

Donald Condie acknowledged limits in his source review and medication knowledge, while resisting some dosing inferences and agreeing to limits on reported voice-hearing.

Redirect
Donald Condie - Redirect Examination Donald Condie Kevin Reddington
19 lines

Donald Condie discussed fears that may inhibit symptom disclosure, episodic psychosis and cautions about SSRI prescribing in bipolar disorder.

Recross
Donald Condie - Recross-Examination Donald Condie Shanan Buckingham
19 lines

Donald Condie acknowledged that he had not interviewed the defendant and was speculating about her concerns. A technology problem affected scheduling after his testimony.

Highlights

4. Elizabeth Laposata — Direct/Cross/Redirect/Recross

Defense pathologist Elizabeth Laposata described Clancy’s injuries and defended her headfirst-fall reconstruction. Questioning then focused on strangulation timing and whether looped resistance bands could maintain pressure without being held.

→
Direct
Elizabeth Laposata - Direct Examination Elizabeth Laposata Kevin Reddington
139 lines

Elizabeth Laposata explained the children's marks, Lindsay Clancy's cutting injuries, and a headfirst fall that caused severe spinal injuries and hypothermia.

Cross
Elizabeth Laposata - Cross-Examination Elizabeth Laposata Jennifer Sprague
126 lines

Sprague challenged Laposata's fall reconstruction and strangulation timing. Hospital head photographs were admitted as Exhibit 282; Laposata distinguished ligature from manual strangulation.

Redirect
Elizabeth Laposata - Redirect Examination Elizabeth Laposata Kevin Reddington
7 lines

Elizabeth Laposata distinguished manual from resistance-band strangulation and explained why she viewed the prior case raised on cross-examination as different.

Recross
Elizabeth Laposata - Recross-Examination Elizabeth Laposata Jennifer Sprague
5 lines

Laposata agreed that ligature pressure must continue for several minutes after unconsciousness to cause death.

Redirect
Elizabeth Laposata - Further Redirect Examination Elizabeth Laposata Kevin Reddington
5 lines

Laposata explained that elastic ligature loops maintained compression without continued manual pressure, with death occurring minutes later.

Recross
Elizabeth Laposata - Further Recross-Examination Elizabeth Laposata Jennifer Sprague
32 lines

Sprague challenged whether wrapped exercise bands would stay in place. Laposata maintained her compression explanation but acknowledged that Sprague's demonstrated arrangement came apart.

Highlights

← Day 142026 Criminal TrialDay 16 →