Judge Sullivan repeated the reasonable-doubt instruction and maintained his approach after the defense sought further inquiry and removal of a deliberating juror.
Full day summary
Judge Sullivan repeated the reasonable-doubt instruction, emphasizing the Commonwealth's burden, the insufficiency of a strong probability of guilt, and the requirement to acquit if reasonable doubt remained. He directed jurors to resume deliberations.
Defense counsel Kevin Reddington then sought further inquiry and removal of a deliberating juror, arguing that a foreperson's communication reported refusal to follow the instruction. The Commonwealth supported the court's questioning and reinstruction. Sullivan maintained his approach, citing jurors' assurances that they could follow instructions and declining to take sides in deliberations. He noted the defense objection. Jurors were later excused until 9:00 the next morning with reminders to avoid coverage and not discuss the case.
16:22