Skip to content
Lindsay Clancy— Case Archive
evidenceevidencedocument2026 Criminal TrialHeilbrun's evaluation reportHeilbrun said his report listed the records he reviewed over four pages and stated his understanding of the criminal-responsibility standard on its first page. Avram Mack testified that he had reviewed the report and thought Heilbrun had diagnosed bipolar II disorder. On cross-examination and recross-examination, Heilbrun confirmed that the report described Clancy as cooperative, affable and friendly and cited Phillip Resnick's research in connection with malingering.
← All Evidence
Documents & Records

Heilbrun's evaluation report

Heilbrun said his report listed the records he reviewed over four pages and stated his understanding of the criminal-responsibility standard on its first page. Avram Mack testified that he had reviewed the report and thought Heilbrun had diagnosed bipolar II disorder. On cross-examination and recross-examination, Heilbrun confirmed that the report described Clancy as cooperative, affable and friendly and cited Phillip Resnick's research in connection with malingering.

6 proceedings6 mentions1 trial
Also known as (2)
  • Dr. Heilbrun's report
  • Heilbrun's report

About

The report set out the criminal-responsibility standard guiding Heilbrun's evaluation of how Clancy's symptoms affected her appreciation of wrongfulness and capacity to conform her conduct to law. Heilbrun acknowledged that the court would instruct the jury on the governing standard.

Trial Record (6)