Skip to content
personpersonSejal ShahSejal ShahPsychiatrist and associate chief of the Division of Psychiatry and Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital.← All People
WitnessBrigham and Women's Hospital

Sejal Shah

Courtroom still of Sejal Shah.

Psychiatrist and associate chief of the Division of Psychiatry and Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital.

184 lines·5 proceedings·2 mentions

About

Sejal Shah testified for the Commonwealth on Day 5 about psychiatric evaluations of Lindsay Clancy beginning January 29, 2023. She diagnosed delirium after observing confusion and cognitive errors, and described possible medical contributors including oxygen desaturation, recent anesthesia, and an elevated heart rate. Clinicians delayed changing Clancy's healthcare proxies from her husband to her parents until reassessment the next day, when the delirium had cleared and her choice remained consistent.

Shah qualified what those findings established. Normal CAT scans did not exclude brain injury, and capacity for a relatively low-risk proxy change did not establish an absence of impairment. During February follow-ups, Clancy denied suicidal and homicidal symptoms and hallucinations and expressed hope about rehabilitation. February 21 notes recorded low mood without a current major depressive episode. Shah's hospital assessments concerned safety, medication, mental status, and medical decision-making, not an opinion on criminal responsibility at the time of the charged events.

On cross-examination by Kevin Reddington, Shah agreed generally that people experiencing psychosis can communicate, plan, and act on plans. She reviewed psychiatric prescriptions over approximately four months beginning in September 2022 and discussed antidepressant risks, without making case-specific findings of diagnosis or causation. On Jennifer Sprague's redirect, she clarified that the listed drugs were not all taken simultaneously and that she did not know the proposed pill counts. She also agreed that exercise, organized garage cleaning, and selling unwanted possessions do not necessarily indicate mania.

On recross, Shah agreed that symptoms Reddington proposed would matter in psychiatric assessment, without finding that Clancy had those symptoms. She acknowledged not knowing the medication-switching instructions he described. Shah also testified that Clancy requested DNR status the day after her first evaluation. Clinicians did not change her code status in the context of her reporting a serious suicide attempt; Clancy ultimately agreed that her mental health should be stable before she reconsidered that decision.

Trial Record (5)

2026 Trial2026 Criminal TrialJul 27, 2026 – Sep 4, 2026Called by prosecution

Sejal Shah testified for the Commonwealth on Day 5 about Clancy's hospital delirium and capacity to change healthcare proxies. She explained why resolved delirium, normal imaging, and capacity for that decision did not establish an absence of impairment, and clarified the limits of her medication assessments.

Day 5

DirectSejal Shah - Direct ExaminationSejal ShahJennifer Sprague3highlightsMentioned91lines spoken

Summary

Shah described resolving delirium, capacity to change healthcare proxies, and later psychiatric evaluations, while qualifying what normal imaging and proxy capacity establish.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (3)

testimony highlightShah explained that the healthcare-proxy change was delayed until reassessment the next day because of delirium and recent medical events. She said the delirium cleared and Clancy consistently chose her parents.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
testimony highlightAsked about an absence of brain injury, Shah cited an earlier Glasgow Coma Scale score of 10 and explained that normal CAT scans do not exclude brain injury. She acknowledged the reported absence of visible imaging abnormalities and external head injuries.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
testimony highlightShah rejected a categorical link between brain impairment and inability to change a healthcare proxy, explaining that many affected patients retain decision-making abilities and that proxy changes are relatively low-risk decisions.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 22

ClosingClosing Argument - DefenseKevin ReddingtonMentioned

Summary

Reddington argued that medication, treatment failures, and psychosis left Lindsay without criminal responsibility. He challenged the investigation and prosecution experts, disputed interpretations of physical and digital evidence, and emphasized the Commonwealth's burden of proof.

Mentioned in this proceeding.