Skip to content
personpersonJonathan O'LoughlinJonathan O'LoughlinMassachusetts State Police trooper assigned to Logan Airport who previously worked in Crime Scene Services.← All People
Law enforcementMassachusetts State Police

Jonathan O'Loughlin

Courtroom still of Jonathan O'Loughlin.

Massachusetts State Police trooper assigned to Logan Airport who previously worked in Crime Scene Services.

94 lines·2 proceedings·1 mention

About

State Trooper Jonathan O'Loughlin testified for the Commonwealth on Day 6 about photographing and processing the secured scene at 47 Summer Street in Duxbury on January 24, 2023. He explained that documentation began after the signed search warrant arrived and was photographed, and distinguished photographic placards from laboratory evidence numbers.

O'Loughlin described fingerprint processing and explained why it precedes biological testing. He reported insufficient fingerprint detail for comparison on the knife and the yellow, black, and blue exercise bands. During his testimony, the judge admitted photographs of the knife and cellphone and admitted the knife as Exhibit 179. Three photographs documenting a brown journal's location were also admitted. O'Loughlin placed the dresser in the basement and said that, to his knowledge, the state police detective unit collected the journal.

On cross-examination, Kevin Reddington questioned his training and emphasized his agreement that he obtained no fingerprints. O'Loughlin described fingerprint certification as usually requiring about a year of internal training, rather than attendance at a specific school. He clarified that his responsibility was documenting evidence, not searching for items. His agreement that he would photograph a hypothetical discovery involving additional drugs, blood, and a knife did not establish that those drugs were found. The judge sustained a defense follow-up about the fingerprint result. The Commonwealth declined redirect, and O'Loughlin was excused.

Trial Record (2)

2026 Trial2026 Criminal TrialJul 27, 2026 – Sep 4, 2026Called by prosecution

State Trooper Jonathan O'Loughlin testified on Day 6 about crime-scene documentation and the lack of comparison-quality fingerprints on a knife and three exercise bands. On cross-examination, he distinguished his evidence-documentation duties from searching for items.

Day 6

DirectDirect Examination - Jonathan O'LoughlinJonathan O'LoughlinShanan Buckingham2highlights85lines spoken

Summary

O'Loughlin described scene photography and evidence collection, reported no comparison-quality fingerprints on the knife or exercise bands, and authenticated admitted exhibits.

Highlights (2)

testimony highlightO'Loughlin reported insufficient fingerprint detail for comparison on the knife and no comparison-quality detail on the yellow, black, or blue exercise bands.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
evidence eventThree photographs documenting a brown journal's location were admitted; the reporter announced Exhibit 181 and 182. O'Loughlin confirmed that the dresser was in the basement and, to his knowledge, the state police detective unit collected the journal.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
CrossCross-Examination - Jonathan O'LoughlinJonathan O'LoughlinKevin Reddington1highlightMentioned9lines spoken

Summary

O'Loughlin confirmed no fingerprints were obtained and distinguished documenting evidence from searching; a defense follow-up drew a sustained ruling.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightReddington posed a hypothetical about finding additional drugs in a bedroom nightstand near blood and a knife. O'Loughlin agreed he would photograph that scenario; the exchange did not establish that those drugs were actually found.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶