Skip to content
Lindsay Clancy— Case Archive
evidenceevidencedocument2026 Criminal TrialR, S and TChiappini agreed that the three documents displayed substantially matching phone identifiers but could not confirm that they identified Lindsay Clancy's phone. The documents remained marked for identification only.
← All Evidence
Documents & Records

R, S and T

Chiappini agreed that the three documents displayed substantially matching phone identifiers but could not confirm that they identified Lindsay Clancy's phone. The documents remained marked for identification only.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial
Also known as (1)
  • Three Cellebrite report documents reviewed for search entries and matching device identifiers; marked for identification only

Trial Record (1)