Skip to content
Lindsay Clancy— Case Archive
evidenceevidencedocument2026 Criminal TrialDr. Resnick's forensic psychiatric evaluation reportIn discussing his report, Resnick maintained that Clancy's belief that her children would be better off in heaven rather than motherless was a psychotic distortion accompanying the reported command hallucination. Heilbrun contrasted the report's account of Clancy's awareness of wrongfulness with what she told him. Saathoff agreed that Resnick had concluded Clancy was not lying to him.
← All Evidence
Documents & Records

Dr. Resnick's forensic psychiatric evaluation report

In discussing his report, Resnick maintained that Clancy's belief that her children would be better off in heaven rather than motherless was a psychotic distortion accompanying the reported command hallucination. Heilbrun contrasted the report's account of Clancy's awareness of wrongfulness with what she told him. Saathoff agreed that Resnick had concluded Clancy was not lying to him.

8 proceedings8 mentions1 trial
Also known as (5)
  • Dr. Resnick's report
  • Dr. Philip Resnick's report
  • Forensic psychiatric evaluation of Philip J. Resnick from September 27, 2024
  • Resnick's report
  • Resnick's report on Ms. Clancy

About

The defense used Resnick's assessment that Clancy was not lying to him to test the scope and basis of Saathoff's malingering concerns.

Trial Record (8)